Well Known

CT

Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT

These figures come from wells tested in Lower Connecticut River Valley Planning Region, CT, not from any one well.

What to test for

Start with the four this site covers:

Most well owners also test for these. We point to the source and don't interpret the results.

The numbers

County figures describe the wells sampled there, not any one well. Exact counts, sample years and sources are below.

Iron Older tests

Level it's compared with0.3 mg/L
Share of wells over the level20%
Wells over the level / wells judged25 of 123
Median0.11 mg/L
Years sampled1953–2017
Wells123
Test results140
Wells left out0
SourcesUSGS (123)

Figures for this county come mostly from older survey wells: fewer than 10 of its wells have a sample since 2000. In Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, where we could compare, such wells showed iron and manganese over the limit more often than homeowner samples did. Test before deciding anything.

Manganese Older tests

Level it's compared with0.05 mg/L
Share of wells over the level32%
Wells over the level / wells judged36 of 111
Median0.02 mg/L
Years sampled1953–2017
Wells111
Test results128
Wells left out0
SourcesUSGS (111)

Figures for this county come mostly from older survey wells: fewer than 10 of its wells have a sample since 2000. In Pennsylvania and Wisconsin, where we could compare, such wells showed iron and manganese over the limit more often than homeowner samples did. Test before deciding anything.

Hardness Older tests

Level it's compared withnone; hardness is shown in bands
Share of wells very hard8.4%
Median72 mg/L as CaCO₃
Years sampled1953–2017
Wells107
Test results122
Wells left out0
SourcesUSGS (107)

Sulfate Older tests

Level it's compared with250 mg/L
Share of wells over the level2.1%
Wells over the level / wells judged2 of 96
Median17 mg/L
Years sampled1953–2017
Wells96
Test results109
Wells left out0
SourcesUSGS (96)